Oleg Shovkunenko
Helmet Helmet 1m Vladislav, not sure that the photo is "helmet 1M". As you can see in the photo, taken from the official "Ukrspetsexport" page from "1M Helmets" has quite a pronounced peak, and the shape of the dome more rounded. However, as you rightly pointed out, in the "helmet 1M" indicates the presence of a thick inner layer of molded ballistic high molecular weight polyethylene.
It is likely that over the years the production of Ukrainian NPP TEMP-3000 has repeatedly changed the design of the "Helmets 1M" (as indicated by the set quite similar to each other pictures of this helmet placed on the network), from here and there was confusion. Perhaps the signature of the photos in the article at all take away the name of the helmet.
Alex 09/28/15
Tell me, which of military helmets protect the head for class 3? Something on this subject, I can not find a clear answer. Maybe, you know?
Oleg Shovkunenko
Alex, honestly, never heard of serial helmets 3 class. There is information about the experimental steel helmet 3rd class BS-1 Research Institute for Steel Development, as well as the assault of a helmet as much as 5 class BSHK-5 ( "Volcano-5"), which is constructed in digital computers "Armokom". But I think that this is typical of advertising gimmicks manufacturers.
Prototypes are made ??specifically for the exhibition. Like, what we see are steep! We are already doing protection, which other even do not dare to think. In fact, the existence of a helmet Class 3 would mean that it protects against bullets from AKM to 10 m, and class 5 helmet - a bullet from SVD at the same distance.
All this, to put it mildly, not really. Actually, of course, you can create a helmet that does not take even armor-piercing ammunition, but only that of Superman will wear it? First, the helmet will be damn hard (for example, declared mass "Volcano-5" - 4.5 kg). Can you imagine what a drag "cap" and how "comfortable" in her head twisting on his head? Second, the bullet of 7.62 mm, even with no body armor penetration brings down its owner off his feet, and that is when it gets here in this supershlem 3-5 class?
That's right, the fighter is guaranteed to wring his neck. If you carefully read my article, you must be aware of these experiments, which, alas, to no avail held during the First World War.
Oh, and one more thing ... You may have heard about foreign helmets American standard IIIA (3A). This standard corresponds to the Russian 2a, in other words, provides protection against shotgun 12 gauge, but not from bullets Kalashnikov.
Andrei-Barmaley 11.11.15
Very interesting information on helmets, collected in one place. I'm sorry, I'm more interested in all the same modern models and in connection with this question: which of the helmet, the production of the USSR / Russian Federation can be worn with glasses for vision correction? Do this kind of experience? The fact that a strong pressing of the ears to the earpiece causes painful feeling, not once, but always.
Oleg Shovkunenko
Andrew, I rarely saw the soldiers and officers of the visually impaired, who had to wear glasses under the Soviet helmets NL-68. Special inconveniences they did not cause, as this edge of the helmet is quite broad and not close to the head. Of course, ssh-68 rather old design, which does not provide protection even in class 1. Therefore the men who have a problem with wearing glasses under a helmet, you can suggest a model with open ears. For example, the NPP "class" (Moscow) publishes a safety helmet "TOP", which is one of the modifications just with open ears.
This Information is posted & researched by - TheBikeHelmets.Com
Helmet "TOP"
Housing: aramid materials Protection Level: Class BR1 or Sp2 GOST R 50744-95 of 2014; V50 - 500 m / s Protection area: 11.8 / 12.5 sq.dm. (data for size 2) Weight: 1.1 / 1.2 kg. - Data for the 2-dimensions at BR1 level of protection; 2.2 / 2.3 kg. - Data for the 2-dimensions at the level of protection Sp2 Notes: helmet "TOP" is adapted for use of different attachments: a mount for night vision and side universal strap.
No comments:
Post a Comment